No Result
View All Result
  • Eng
    • Rom
    • Eng
    • Рус
Logo EN
  • About us
    • Presentation
    • Reports
    • Partners
    • Contacts
  • Media
    • News
    • Campaigns
    • Podcast
  • Litigation
    • ECtHR
      • Communicated Cases
      • Judgments
  • Elections
    • Parliamentary
      • Parliamentary 2025
      • Early 2021
      • Parliamentary 2019
      • Parliamentary 2014
      • Parliamentary 2010
      • July 2009
      • April 2009
    • Presidential
      • Presidential 2024
      • Presidential 2020
      • Presidential 2016
    • General local
      • General local 2023
      • General local 2019
      • General local 2015
      • General local 2011
    • Referendum
      • Referendum 2024
      • Referendum 2017
      • Referendum 2010
    • New local
  • Publications
    • Human Rights
    • Democratic Processes
  • Grants
    • About Grants Program
    • Grant Competitions
    • Awarded Grants
  • Announcements
    • Procurement
    • Job opportunities
    • Other
Logo EN Alb
  • About us
    • Presentation
    • Reports
    • Partners
    • Contacts
  • Media
    • News
    • Campaigns
    • Podcast
  • Litigation
    • ECtHR
      • Communicated Cases
      • Judgments
  • Elections
    • Parliamentary
      • Parliamentary 2025
      • Early 2021
      • Parliamentary 2019
      • Parliamentary 2014
      • Parliamentary 2010
      • July 2009
      • April 2009
    • Presidential
      • Presidential 2024
      • Presidential 2020
      • Presidential 2016
    • General local
      • General local 2023
      • General local 2019
      • General local 2015
      • General local 2011
    • Referendum
      • Referendum 2024
      • Referendum 2017
      • Referendum 2010
    • New local
  • Publications
    • Human Rights
    • Democratic Processes
  • Grants
    • About Grants Program
    • Grant Competitions
    • Awarded Grants
  • Announcements
    • Procurement
    • Job opportunities
    • Other
No Result
View All Result
  • Eng
    • Rom
    • Eng
    • Рус
Logo EN Alb
No Result
View All Result

Promo-LEX > News > Discrimination against women found in the first case submitted against Moldova at the UN Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women

Discrimination against women found in the first case submitted against Moldova at the UN Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women

20/03/2017
in News

The Promo-LEX Association announces the first case from the Republic of Moldova in which the UN Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) has found the existence of discrimination, following from a lack of intervention in a case of domestic violence.

The plaintiff was born in 1959. She was a victim of domestic violence during a significant period of her life, but her complaints against her abuser did not come to anything. Criminal proceedings were begun regarding the complaints, but, repeatedly, they were suspended after a while. Eventually, the criminal case was closed because of the expiration of the statute of limitations. The plaintiff maintained that the authorities of the Republic of Moldova violated the provisions of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women.

On 10 March 2017, CEDAW made public the text of its recommendations adopted on 2 March 2017. The text contains the findings and conclusions of the Committee, that the Republic of Moldova did not fulfill its obligations and therefore violated the rights of the plaintiff under articles 1, 2 (a), (c), (d), and (e), 5 (a), and 16 of the Convention. The Committee decided that the authorities should take immediate and effective measures to guarantee the physical and psychological integrity of the plaintiff and that she should receive reparations proportional to the physical and psychological damage caused.

The Committee recommended modifying legislation so that it does not contain rules that are discriminatory toward victims of domestic violence, who are most often women. At the same time the Committee appreciated that the authorities are open to modifying the relevant legal framework. By accepting the competence of CEDAW to examine individual cases, the Republic of Moldova has also assumed the obligation to act in good faith, which means the obligation to take appropriate measures and to recover the reparations due to the plaintiff. Therefore, along with the need to fulfill general obligations, the state will need to pay reparations to the plaintiff. CEDAW has previously set moral damages comprising between 2500 and 5000 Euros for victims of discrimination.

The Optional Protocol entered into force for the Republic of Moldova on 28 February 2006. Up to now, only 3 complaints against the Republic of Moldova have been registered before CEDAW, and the one described above is both the first complaint registered and the first found in the favor of the plaintiff.

The additional protocol of the CEDAW was ratified by 189 states. Overall, CEDAW has registered only 113 cases since 2003. The CEDAW has found violations in 24 cases, a lack of violations in 2 cases, 35 cases have been declared inadmissible, and in 10 cases proceedings were closed. At the moment only 42 cases are pending.

The plaintiff was represented by lawyers and legal experts from the Promo-LEX Association.

The complete test of the Recommendations can be found here.

The press conference can be followed on Privesc.eu.

For more details, please contact: Carolina Bondarciuc, Promo-LEX Press Officer: GSM 060280980, Tel./Fax (+373 22) 450024, e-mail: [email protected]


¹The CEDAW Committee acts on the basis of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, an international treaty adopted in 1979 by the General Assembly of the United Nations. The Treaty was ratified by the Parliament of the Republic of Moldova in Decision nr. 87-XII on 28 April 1994.

Previous Post

The frequent use of the pretrial detention in the Republic of Moldova – Speech at the UN Human Rights Council

Next Post

Lessons from Kiev: Recapping the Election Data Academy

Logo EN

Elections, Democratic Processes Program

Human Rights Program

Mitropolit Petru Movila Street 23/13
MD-2004, Chisinau, Moldova

e-mail: [email protected]

101.promolex.md
monitor.md

© 2026 Promo-LEX
Facebook-f Twitter Linkedin-in Instagram Dribbble
No Result
View All Result
  • About us
    • Presentation
    • Reports
    • Partners
    • Contacts
  • Media
    • News
    • Campaigns
    • Podcast
  • Litigation
    • ECtHR
      • Communicated Cases
      • Judgments
  • Elections
    • Parliamentary
      • Parliamentary 2025
      • Early 2021
      • Parliamentary 2019
      • Parliamentary 2014
      • Parliamentary 2010
      • July 2009
      • April 2009
    • Presidential
      • Presidential 2024
      • Presidential 2020
      • Presidential 2016
    • General local
      • General local 2023
      • General local 2019
      • General local 2015
      • General local 2011
    • Referendum
      • Referendum 2024
      • Referendum 2017
      • Referendum 2010
    • New local
  • Publications
    • Human Rights
    • Democratic Processes
  • Grants
    • About Grants Program
    • Grant Competitions
    • Awarded Grants
  • Announcements
    • Procurement
    • Job opportunities
    • Other
  • Rom
  • Рус

© 2024 Promo-Lex