No Result
View All Result
  • Eng
    • Rom
    • Eng
    • Рус
Logo EN
  • About us
    • Presentation
    • Reports
    • Partners
    • Contacts
  • Media
    • News
    • Campaigns
    • Podcast
  • Litigation
    • ECtHR
      • Communicated Cases
      • Judgments
  • Elections
    • Parliamentary
      • Parliamentary 2025
      • Early 2021
      • Parliamentary 2019
      • Parliamentary 2014
      • Parliamentary 2010
      • July 2009
      • April 2009
    • Presidential
      • Presidential 2024
      • Presidential 2020
      • Presidential 2016
    • General local
      • General local 2023
      • General local 2019
      • General local 2015
      • General local 2011
    • Referendum
      • Referendum 2024
      • Referendum 2017
      • Referendum 2010
    • New local
  • Publications
    • Human Rights
    • Democratic Processes
  • Grants
    • About Grants Program
    • Grant Competitions
    • Awarded Grants
  • Announcements
    • Procurement
    • Job opportunities
    • Other
Logo EN Alb
  • About us
    • Presentation
    • Reports
    • Partners
    • Contacts
  • Media
    • News
    • Campaigns
    • Podcast
  • Litigation
    • ECtHR
      • Communicated Cases
      • Judgments
  • Elections
    • Parliamentary
      • Parliamentary 2025
      • Early 2021
      • Parliamentary 2019
      • Parliamentary 2014
      • Parliamentary 2010
      • July 2009
      • April 2009
    • Presidential
      • Presidential 2024
      • Presidential 2020
      • Presidential 2016
    • General local
      • General local 2023
      • General local 2019
      • General local 2015
      • General local 2011
    • Referendum
      • Referendum 2024
      • Referendum 2017
      • Referendum 2010
    • New local
  • Publications
    • Human Rights
    • Democratic Processes
  • Grants
    • About Grants Program
    • Grant Competitions
    • Awarded Grants
  • Announcements
    • Procurement
    • Job opportunities
    • Other
No Result
View All Result
  • Eng
    • Rom
    • Eng
    • Рус
Logo EN Alb
No Result
View All Result

Promo-LEX > News > The Supreme Court of Justice directly applied the provisions of the ECHR and ordered the collection from the state budget of the amount of 72,000 MDL for the benefit of a man illegally deprived of liberty in prison

The Supreme Court of Justice directly applied the provisions of the ECHR and ordered the collection from the state budget of the amount of 72,000 MDL for the benefit of a man illegally deprived of liberty in prison

25/06/2021
in News

On 16 June 2020, the Supreme Court of Justice issued a Decision by which it is found a violation of the right to liberty for a period of 36 days to the applicant Vladimir Karatun, represented by the lawyer of the Promo-LEX Association, with full compensation of material and moral damages.

The applicant was to be released from detention on 9 August 2019. However, due to the fact that the decision of the Chisinau Court (Ciocana headquarters) was not sent immediately for execution to the penitentiary institution, Vladimir Karatun was released from detention, only on 18 September 2019.

In these circumstances, the magistrates found that the detention of the applicant between 9 August and 18 September 2019, was arbitrary and unjustified, contrary to the provisions of art. 5 of the European Convention of Human Rights.

The applicant claimed that he had been detained over time and had the right to compensation for non-pecuniary damage caused by illegal detention and estimated this damage at 72,000 MDL (two thousand MDL for each day of illegal detention).

By the decision of 31 October 2020, the Chisinau Court (Centru headquarters), partially admitted the action. The violation of the applicant’s right, provided by art. 5 § 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), as a result of the delay in his release from detention for 36 days. Therefore, the court ordered the collection of the amount of 15,200 MDL as moral damage for the benefit of the applicant.

In November 2020, both the applicant and the National Administration of Penitentiaries (ANP) appealed against the first instance decision. However, they were rejected by the Chisinau Court of Appeal, by the decision of 11 March 2021, maintaining the decision of the Chisinau Court (Centru headquarters) of 31 October 2020.

In April 2021, the applicant and the ANP appealed against the decision of the Chisinau Court of Appeal of 11 March 2021. In the motivation of the appeal, the National Administration of Penitentiaries invoked the illegality of the decision of the court of appeal and indicated that the applicant does not have the right to request pecuniary compensations in view of the provisions of Law no. 1545 of 25 February 1998.

On the other hand, Vladimir Karatun expressed his disagreement with the court’s solution and noted that the amount of compensation of 72,000 MDL is a fair and equitable reward for the suffering caused to him and his family members. Thus, the court, when determining the amount of compensation for the moral damage suffered by him, was to take into account the decisions of the ECHR in which, for violating the art. 5 of the Convention, the Court granted a compensation of approximately 2,000 MDL for each day of illegal detention.

By the decision of the Supreme Court of Justice of 16 June 2021, the appeal of the ANP was rejected, the decision of the Chisinau Court of Appeal of 11 March 2021 was amended, but also the decision of the Chisinau Court (Center headquarters) of 31 October 2020. At the same time, it was ordered to repair the material and moral damage and to compensate the court costs, by collecting from the state budget the amount of 72,000 MDL considered by the magistrates as fair for the benefit of Vladimir Karatun.

According to the lawyer of the Promo-LEX Association, Donica (Gamurari) Victoria: “In the court acts of disposition, we note that regarding the plaintiff, the violation of the provisions of art. 5 paragraph 1 of the Convention was found, as a result of unlawful deprivation of liberty for a period of 36 days, with the direct application of the Convention. It is gratifying that the Supreme Court of Justice took into account, when determining the amount of compensation, the amount of just satisfaction granted by the ECHR in similar situations for violating art. 5 of the Convention. ”

Details about a similar case can be found here

Previous Post

ECHR ordered Moldova to pay 9,000 euros to a victim, abused and humiliated by guards in a penitentiary in Briceni

Next Post

Russia convicted by ECtHR on the case of Ion Manole and Alexandru Postica as a result of the incident on the Vadul lui Voda bridge of 2005

Logo EN

Elections, Democratic Processes Program

Human Rights Program

Mitropolit Petru Movila Street 23/13
MD-2004, Chisinau, Moldova

e-mail: [email protected]

101.promolex.md
monitor.md

© 2026 Promo-LEX
Facebook-f Twitter Linkedin-in Instagram Dribbble
No Result
View All Result
  • About us
    • Presentation
    • Reports
    • Partners
    • Contacts
  • Media
    • News
    • Campaigns
    • Podcast
  • Litigation
    • ECtHR
      • Communicated Cases
      • Judgments
  • Elections
    • Parliamentary
      • Parliamentary 2025
      • Early 2021
      • Parliamentary 2019
      • Parliamentary 2014
      • Parliamentary 2010
      • July 2009
      • April 2009
    • Presidential
      • Presidential 2024
      • Presidential 2020
      • Presidential 2016
    • General local
      • General local 2023
      • General local 2019
      • General local 2015
      • General local 2011
    • Referendum
      • Referendum 2024
      • Referendum 2017
      • Referendum 2010
    • New local
  • Publications
    • Human Rights
    • Democratic Processes
  • Grants
    • About Grants Program
    • Grant Competitions
    • Awarded Grants
  • Announcements
    • Procurement
    • Job opportunities
    • Other
  • Rom
  • Рус

© 2024 Promo-Lex