No Result
View All Result
  • Eng
    • Rom
    • Eng
    • Рус
Logo EN
  • About us
    • Presentation
    • Reports
    • Partners
    • Contacts
  • Media
    • News
    • Campaigns
    • Podcast
  • Litigation
    • ECtHR
      • Communicated Cases
      • Judgments
  • Elections
    • Parliamentary
      • Parliamentary 2025
      • Early 2021
      • Parliamentary 2019
      • Parliamentary 2014
      • Parliamentary 2010
      • July 2009
      • April 2009
    • Presidential
      • Presidential 2024
      • Presidential 2020
      • Presidential 2016
    • General local
      • General local 2023
      • General local 2019
      • General local 2015
      • General local 2011
    • Referendum
      • Referendum 2024
      • Referendum 2017
      • Referendum 2010
    • New local
  • Publications
    • Human Rights
    • Democratic Processes
  • Grants
    • About Grants Program
    • Grant Competitions
    • Awarded Grants
  • Announcements
    • Procurement
    • Job opportunities
    • Other
Logo EN Alb
  • About us
    • Presentation
    • Reports
    • Partners
    • Contacts
  • Media
    • News
    • Campaigns
    • Podcast
  • Litigation
    • ECtHR
      • Communicated Cases
      • Judgments
  • Elections
    • Parliamentary
      • Parliamentary 2025
      • Early 2021
      • Parliamentary 2019
      • Parliamentary 2014
      • Parliamentary 2010
      • July 2009
      • April 2009
    • Presidential
      • Presidential 2024
      • Presidential 2020
      • Presidential 2016
    • General local
      • General local 2023
      • General local 2019
      • General local 2015
      • General local 2011
    • Referendum
      • Referendum 2024
      • Referendum 2017
      • Referendum 2010
    • New local
  • Publications
    • Human Rights
    • Democratic Processes
  • Grants
    • About Grants Program
    • Grant Competitions
    • Awarded Grants
  • Announcements
    • Procurement
    • Job opportunities
    • Other
No Result
View All Result
  • Eng
    • Rom
    • Eng
    • Рус
Logo EN Alb
No Result
View All Result

Promo-LEX > News > Violations found by Promo-LEX Association on the eve of the local referendum on the dismissal of Chisinau General Mayor and the new local elections in 10 settlements

Violations found by Promo-LEX Association on the eve of the local referendum on the dismissal of Chisinau General Mayor and the new local elections in 10 settlements

17/11/2017
in News

On 17 November 2017, Promo-LEX Association published the second report of the Observation Mission for the local referendum on the dismissal of Chișinău General Mayor and the new local elections of 19 November 2017.

Legal deviations were found in the electoral process both in Chișinău, and in the 10 settlements where new local elections will be held on 19 November, this year: town of Sângera-Chișinău, township of Berlinți-Briceni, township of Zârnești-Cahul, township of Plopi-Cantemir, township of Stefanesti-Floresti, village of Fundurii Noi-Glodeni, township of Lapusna-Hâncesti, township of Sărăteni-Leova, village of Căpriana-Strășeni, township of Ghiliceni-Telenești.

Expenditures of the participants in the Chișinău referendum – more transparent
Promo-LEX observers noticed a better reporting on TV, printed media, radio and online advertising and it also found a deficient reporting on the promotional, outdoors and mobile materials, transport expenses and volunteer involvement.

On the other hand, during 28 October – 10 November 2017, the participants used funds that were not declared fully. They also failed to include certain expenditures in the reports submitted to the Central Electoral Commission (CEC). The non-reported expenditures amounted to about MDL 285,000.

4 times larger donations for PSRM
The local referendum on the dismissal of Chișinău General Mayor was supported by individuals only. Thus, THe Liberal Party (PL) had 7 donors, who contributed with MDL 285,000; whereas The Socialist Party of Moldova (PSRM) had 15 times more donors (a total of 115), who contributed with about MDL 1,200,000 – 4 times more than in the case of the first participant. Moreover, the participants barely reached 11% of the threshold established by CEC (MDL 16,508,739.00).

Administrative resources used during the campaign
Both parties, competing in the Chisinau local referendum, organised meetings with voters during the working hours. Such meeting were held in healthcare facilities, educational and public institutions. Ten such cases were reported during the reporting period: PSRM – 4 cases, and PL – 6 cases. The First Promo-LEX Report found only one violation of this type, committed by PSRM.

Equipment of polling stations – satisfactory
The phone survey, made by Promo-LEX Association, revealed that most polling stations have the necessary conditions for their work – heating, Internet connection, and sufficient light.

Activity of electoral management bodies
The electoral management bodies worked according to the established timetable. However, about 20% of the visited electoral offices of the polling stations were not open during the working hours.

CEC adopted decisions regarding the receipt of financial statements, accreditation of observers, and changes to the membership of Chisinau Electoral Council. 453 Promo-LEX observers were accredited. In addition, 4 international observers were accredited (from Netherlands and Romania).

On the other hand, the complaints filed with regards to both the Chișinău referendum and the new local elections were rejected by CEC.

Lack of clarity on how to vote on the basis of a Voting Rights Certificate
Promo-LEX found a lack of a clear definition of the procedure of voting on the basis of a Voting Rights Certificate, its role in the electoral process and who can vote under this procedure.

In general, voters may vote at the polling station in the vicinity of the address provided in the loose leaf of the ID card. However, the law allows people to vote also on the basis of a Voting Rights Certificate at local elections (in the same constituency) or at a local referendum. On the other hand, Promo-LEX noticed that CEC had allowed voting on the basis of such a certificate only to members of the electoral offices. Therefore, this opportunity will not be available to those who would like to vote at their workplace, but who are included in the list of voters at another polling station, close to their domicile or place of residence.

Paved pathways by a competitor in the new local elections
The law prohibits provision of any goods or services during the election campaign. However, a candidate from the Democratic Party of Moldova (PDM) contributed to the repair of the Postal Office, and to paving the pathways that go to the main road.

Other violations are related to displaying promotional materials on a gas pipe, while the law allows it only on the spaces provided by the authorities or private panels.  Moreover, an independent candidate incurred expenditures without opening a ‘Electoral Fund’ bank account and without reporting to the relevant authority. Like in the case of the Chișinău referendum, some of the distributed leaflets did not state the name of the printing house and the number of the copies issued.

Hate speech
Promo-LEX Association draws the attention on elements of hate speech in competitors’ messages. Thus, Promo-LEX recorded a number of messages containing elements of denigrating or hate speech. They mainly targeted Dorin Chirtoacă – in at least 5 cases, and one case the hate speech came from the respective person.

‘Ieși la VOT!’ (‘Come and Vote!’) Promo-LEX Campaign
Under the ‘Ieși la vot!’ campaign, the Association informed door to door about 3400 voters and organised debates with candidates to the position of mayors in the settlements where new local elections will take place.

For more details please see the full version of the report.

The Observation Missions for the local referendum on the dismissal of Chisinau General Mayor and the new local elections of 19 November 2017 are funded by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and are co-funded by the Justice and Human Rights Development of Soros Foundation-Moldova.

Contacts: Emil Gaitur, Promo-LEX Communicator – tel.: +37369172642; email: [email protected].

Previous Post

A Study For the European Parliament Found That the Electoral Reforms in Moldova, Georgia and Ukraine Were Made in a Rush

Next Post

Promo-LEX Association: The First Findings Related to the Referendum on the Dismissal of Chișinău General Mayor

Logo EN

Elections, Democratic Processes Program

Human Rights Program

Mitropolit Petru Movila Street 23/13
MD-2004, Chisinau, Moldova

e-mail: [email protected]

101.promolex.md
monitor.md

© 2026 Promo-LEX
Facebook-f Twitter Linkedin-in Instagram Dribbble
No Result
View All Result
  • About us
    • Presentation
    • Reports
    • Partners
    • Contacts
  • Media
    • News
    • Campaigns
    • Podcast
  • Litigation
    • ECtHR
      • Communicated Cases
      • Judgments
  • Elections
    • Parliamentary
      • Parliamentary 2025
      • Early 2021
      • Parliamentary 2019
      • Parliamentary 2014
      • Parliamentary 2010
      • July 2009
      • April 2009
    • Presidential
      • Presidential 2024
      • Presidential 2020
      • Presidential 2016
    • General local
      • General local 2023
      • General local 2019
      • General local 2015
      • General local 2011
    • Referendum
      • Referendum 2024
      • Referendum 2017
      • Referendum 2010
    • New local
  • Publications
    • Human Rights
    • Democratic Processes
  • Grants
    • About Grants Program
    • Grant Competitions
    • Awarded Grants
  • Announcements
    • Procurement
    • Job opportunities
    • Other
  • Rom
  • Рус

© 2024 Promo-Lex